(Repost) Divine Transcendence and the Culture of Change

Let me first thank Eerdmans Publishing Company for sending along a copy of David H. Hopper’s Divine Transcendence and the Culture of Change, for review.

David Hopper has set out an interesting premise in his latest book: Namely have we gone too far in tolerance? He essentially argues that statements such as “It doesn’t matter what a person believes just so long as he/she is sincere,” are the product of ill-educated minds who know very little of theological matters. In other words, it’s one thing to be tolerant in a prudent sort of way, but it is wrong to have no standards at all.

He argues that the divine transcendence of God has been lost in this thoughtless attempt to not step on toes.

Many have perhaps come to the same conclusion, but they have done so by laying the blame on the “scientific revolution,” and its concommitant inference that nothing is beyond the mind of mankind.

Hopper argues that the Reformation, in the guise of Luther, Calvin and others of the same persuasion also played a part, perhaps unknowingly, in fostering this climate.

He starts with the model set out by H. Richard Niebuhr in his Christ and Culture. In it Niebuhr posited five expressions of Jesus and culture:

  1. Christ against culture
  2. Christ of culture
  3. Christ above culture
  4. Christ of culture
  5. Christ the transformer of culture.

He places various movements, the monastic, Calvin, Mainstream Protestant, Catholic, Feminist, and so forth within this model at their most agreeing points.

Hopper sees in the Reformation movement and the following Enlightenment, a movement away from a “religious church-dominated culture” to one predominately secular, and one that has largely discarded its timeless orientation to the changeless and divine.

Luther addressed a church largely caught in the medieval concepts of Christ both above and against culture. The Church controlled the life of people by its claim to control their entrance into heaven. Luther of course had no intent to found a new sect, but rather intended to reform from within. And he of course failed, as the Church, seemingly receptive at first, recoiled at his more “heretical” thinking.

Heretical only in the sense that Rome rejected it, and so labeled it. Martin Luther’s “justification by faith” eliminated the idea that salvation was controlled by the Church. Indeed, Luther shockingly argued that it was faith in and adherence to the Scriptures, available to all of God’s people that was above the Church, and where mankind’s salvation was found. Free gift of grace.

Along with Calvin, others joined in and began to see Christ and the scriptures as calling for a salvation that was deeply imbedded within culture. In fact Calvin claimed that each person’s vocation was his opportunity to live out the Gospel message in service to neighbor.

While Luther did not extend his “Christ in Culture” to include much in the way of serious revamping of political institutions, Calvin did.

What is really new in Hopper’s analysis is that he brings Francis Bacon and the English reformation also into the mix. Bacon, in his “idols of the mind” laid the groundwork for a new way of looking at nature. In fact Bacon saw this as God’s will, that man was untruthful to God in leaving all things as mystery in God.

Bacon freed the mind of all the preconceived notions and “worldviews” and brought forth inductive thinking, pursuing a method of critical thinking. He claimed there were “attainable” truths “hidden by God” in nature, and these were open to being discovered.

Whereas Luther’s holy grail was 1Corinthians 1:18-23. The folly of the cross was God’s foolishness, wiser than that of men, Bacon believes that God has created man to discover the secrets of nature and to use them for the betterment of mankind.

Once married to American pragmatism and work ethic, scientific exploration exploded, and as our grip on a transcendent God seems to have slipped away.

In the end, Hopper argues for a return to a solid foundation in that transcendence. We are mired in our “consumerism” spirituality. We are driven by change for its own sake, and no longer see the limits of our own abilities. Only with a return to this foundation in the transcendent he argues, can we realistically address the common problems in our global world.

This is an interesting book, one for the more serious reader of theology and culture. But one that will seriously re-orient your thinking about progress and the price we are paying for it.

3 Comments (+add yours?)

  1. Tim
    Mar 16, 2011 @ 23:37:23

    And now I have two books to pick up!

    As you’ve no doubt heard me say at my place, it’s important for us to remember tolerance is not permission, nor is acceptance to be confused with indulgence. Without boundaries, the Church (both the Body and institution) loses its distinction altogether and becomes another social organization. How does this square with Its mission to change the world–if it becomes indistinguishable from the world or allows the world to dictate its character?

    I believe far too many of us–particularly we “mainline Protestants”–have misinterpreted the Reformist call for a thoughtful faith to mean a purely intellectual one. We get all wrapped up in nailing everything down so our beliefs logically tally out–as if they were the stuff of chemistry equations–that we sacrifice transcendence. Faith is our entrance to that place between what we know and Who God is. Once there, logic and intellect are subverted by certainty and wisdom, which aren’t dependable on what can be explained. It seems to me that’s where Luther and Calvin sought to direct us–to live with the door always open, if you will, to work and play with our awareness of God’s grace always turned on.

    So maybe it’s best we view ourselves as a culture with in the larger culture that’s empowered to steer the world in a better direction. And if that’s so, then we must accept the gift of transcendence by faith, as it is the change agent for all that we do.

    I may be completely off base here, having not yet read the book. But your review leads me to these thoughts. Thanks for passing the recommendation along!



    • Sherry
      Mar 17, 2011 @ 12:10:38

      Mostly Tim it helped me a lot in understanding Luther, beyond the faith by justification, or at least what he was driving at by it. Calvin really took it to a “neighborly” effort…We stop “working for our own salvation and start working for others. The trouble is we never really worked that further. We exempted it seems our economics and politics from that transcendence and so we haven’t ministered to neighbor in those areas. We remain locked in selfish power and money models. We don’t see politics and economics as means to ends that better all the world, not just ourselves. At leeast I think that’s what Hopper is trying to say. Its a bit heavy as I said.


  2. Trackback: A Genius Awaits You | Holistic Dog Treats

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: